Last Tuesday, a seven-paragraph “article” was published by a New York internet-based group called Food World News (see below), declaring that the CA State Health Department ordered a recall of DBOC oysters.
After it appeared on the internet (and to find out what was going on), Kevin Lunny was immediately contacted and so was Sarah Rolph, and he immediately contacted Ginny Cummings, the oyster farm manager, who in turn, then immediately contacted the State Health Department.
All were stunned. There was no recall. There was no shut-down. No one got ill. Health Department officials knew nothing about it. No warning against was issued. DBOC does not sell oysters to the Wegmans chain (on East Coast).
The Reporter at Food World News claimed the story was triggered by a “Google Alert” which no one at DBOC received and so far, notwithstanding daily requests, the editor and reporter at Food World News have refused to provide.
Within a short time, EAC Executive Director, Amy Trainer, “tweeted” (under the name “ProtectPtReyes” that DBOC oysters “ma(k)ing us sick.” After a demand from DBOC representatives, Trainer’s reckless statement was taken down.
There is no nice way to say or explain this: Whatever the explanation, THIS WAS A SMEAR. This was an attempt to undermine DBOC’s ability to conduct business. This was an effort to drag the Lunny name through the gutter. To declare it “disgusting” is a polite description.
The highly respected Food Safety News (not to be confused with Food World News), as soon as they learned of the bogus story, conducted their own review and this am, published an editorial on-line repudiating the Food World News report.
Below – the Food Safety News Editorial, the Food World News (False) Story and the Amy Trainer Tweet.
From the Food Safety News Editorial.
The Food World News story was entirely false.
The California Department of Public Health did not issue a warning, there was no recall of Drakes Bay oysters, nobody was sickened by Drakes Bay oysters, and Drakes Bay has never sold an oyster directly or through any broker to Wegman’s.
Any company wrongly named in such a story can be expected to push back, but Drakes Bay is involved in a life and death struggle with the U.S. Department of Interior and California Coastal Commission, which is apparently in cahoots with some of the largest environmental groups who want it shut down. Former Interior Secretary Ken Salazar, who has an anger management problem, refused to renew its lease just before he resigned.
However, many conservationists and environmentalists from the region, including those who originally called for protection of the estuary, see a place for the oyster business and support another long-term lease for Drakes Bay.
http://www.foodsafetynews.com/2013/08/letter-from-the-editor-14/#.UhBuZeCABSU
Letter From The Editor: False Story Was NOT Ours!
By Dan Flynn | August 18, 2013
Opinion
Food Safety News is often named as a trusted source by other media, which adds to our credibility as a valued asset. Anything that devalues our credibility concerns us greatly. We experienced one of those devaluing events this week.
Two Food Safety News stories which were published almost one year apart — and had nothing to do with one another except that both dealt with oysters — were mangled together with others by a news website previously unknown to us called “Food World News.”
In their story, written by a newly minted reporter, the New York-based news site reported on Aug. 13, 2013 that: “The state Department of Public Health issued a warning against the largest oyster producer in California on Friday, after three people’s illnesses was linked back to oysters, according to Food Safety News.”
It went on to say the oysters were from the Drakes Bay Oyster Company and included information from both the Huffington Post and the Oakland Tribune, before again citing Food Safety News for reporting the Drakes Bay oysters were sold in Wegmans stores between July 13 and Aug. 5, 2013.
The Food World News story was entirely false.
The California Department of Public Health did not issue a warning, there was no recall of Drakes Bay oysters, nobody was sickened by Drakes Bay oysters, and Drakes Bay has never sold an oyster directly or through any broker to Wegman’s. “Oyster Recall: Drakes Bay Oyster Linked to Bacteria Illnesses; Shellfish Sold from Wegmans,” by Food World News was entirely taken down by the website after folks working for Drakes Bay filed their objections.
Any company wrongly named in such a story can be expected to push back, but Drakes Bay is involved in a life and death struggle with the U.S. Department of Interior and California Coastal Commission, which is apparently in cahoots with some of the largest environmental groups who want it shut down. Former Interior Secretary Ken Salazar, who has an anger management problem, refused to renew its lease just before he resigned.
However, many conservationists and environmentalists from the region, including those who originally called for protection of the estuary, see a place for the oyster business and support another long-term lease for Drakes Bay. The struggle has gone on for a long time and with the government side, especially the National Park Service, being charged by Drakes Bay with running what amounts to disinformation campaign. They have not said this is part of that, but Drakes Bay is trying to get to the bottom of this one.
When you drop a false story into this sort of mix and it is immediately tweeted by the opposition, you can at least understand why the Drakes Bay folks might be a little paranoid. Big forces really are out to get them.
Still, in trying to piece this together on my own, I’ve come to the conclusion that the most likely explanation for what happened was a few missteps by the newbie reporter.
First, last Saturday (Aug 10), Food Safety News did report on the recall of Cape Neddick/Blue Point oysters by the Connecticut Department of Agriculture for possible Vibrio contamination. The oysters were sold at Wegmans stores, between July 13 and Aug 5, 2013.
Second, the trigger for doing their story, according to what little the Drakes Bay people have been able to get out of Food World News, was a Google alert. Nobody else has seen it, but it’s possible. Every once in a while, old stories show up as new on Google alerts, usually due to some change, even very minor ones. As a result, we always check dates and time stamps, but it’s possible to be fooled.
And, third, there was a warning about a few lots of Drakes Bay oysters sent out by the CDPH last year at the very time in question (Aug. 13, 2012). If one those reports was recycled on its anniversary date, and an inexperienced reporter then went looking for what else was available on the same subject, a mess of a story could be the result.
And a mess it was. Just not ours.
© Food Safety News
THE FALSE STORY
Aug 13, 2013 Last Updated: 15:37 PM EDT
Oyster Recall: Drakes Bay Oyster Linked to Bacteria Illness; Shellfish Sold From Wegmans
Aug 13, 2013 03:12 PM EDT | By Dina Exil
The state Department of Public Health issued a warning against the largest oyster producer in California. (Photo : Flickr / ganesha.isis)
The state Department of Public Health issued a warning against the largest oyster producer in California on Friday, after three people’s illness was linked back to oysters, according to Food Safety News.
The oysters are from Drakes Bay Oyster Company, which has shut down all operations after being notified by the Health Department that its oysters may be contaminated with Vibrio parahaemolyticus, a naturally occurring bacterium that can cause serious illness, the company’s manager Ginny Cummings told the Oakland Tribune.
After eating in separate San Francisco restaurants last month, three people reportedly began feeling ill and one reportedly had to be hospitalized. When consumed raw, the oysters pose a health threat, particularly to individuals with compromised immune systems.
The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention reports more than 4,000 cases of Vibrio parahaemolyticus infection occur in the United States every year. Symptoms of infection include watery diarrhea, often with abdominal cramping, nausea, vomiting, fever and chills. Usually these symptoms occur within 24 hours of ingestion. Illness is usually self-limited and lasts three days.
According to the Huffington Post, medical officials have not reported any other illness. Oysters supply almost 40 percent of California’s shellfish.
“As a family business, we’re doing the best we can do under the circumstances, which is a waiting game at this point,” Cummings said, according to the Tribune. “We’re working hand-in-hand with the health department on this. Our biggest concern is that people are healthy.”
According to Food Safety News, the recalled oysters were sold in Wegmans seafood departments between July 13, 2013 and August 5, 2013. They may also have been sold in Wegmans restaurants, Food Bars and Pubs.
A complete list of the recalled products and photos of the shellfish tags and labeling is on the department of public health website.
THE AMY TRAINER, ENVIRONMENTAL ACTION COMMITTEE, “DRAKESBAYOYSTER MA(K)ING US SICK” & CaPublicHealth “SHUTS DBOC DOWN” TWEET
Amy, On Tuesday August 13, 2013, on twitter saying CDPH has shut DBOC down:
“Oysters from @drakesbayoyster ma(k)ing us sick @CaPublicHealth shuts DBOC down”.
Trainer “Tweets” under the handle “ProtectPTReyes”.
The National Park Service used falsified data to shut down an 80-year-old oyster company in Point Reyes, Calif, its owner claims.
07-31-14 The Absurdity of the Removal of DBOC from the earth, or the dillema of feeding 7 Billion today, 9 Billion by 2050
On the last day for retail sales a ceremony was held at DBOC at which a number of people were asked to speak. I was honored to be one of the speakers. Below is the transcript of the speech I gave after introducing myself, informing all of how I came to be involved, and a little about my involvement through this “blog”.
… New York State’s only remaining commercial oyster farm operates on the OYSTER BAY NATIONAL WILDLIFE REFUGE, producing 90% of the State’s oyster harvest. The State of New York has designated the Oyster Bay area as a Significant Coastal Fish and Wildlife Habitat. …. If there, WHY NOT HERE?!
http://oysterbaytown.com/places-to-go-things-to-do/
cover of Nat’l Geographic, May 2014
THE NEW FOOD REVOLUTION –
To feed our hungry planet, we must change the way we farm – and the way we think.
By Jonathan Foley
DIRECTOR OF the Institute on the Environment, University of Minnesota.
“When we think about threats to the environment, we tend to picture cars and smokestacks, not dinner. But the truth is, our need for food poses one of the biggest dangers to the planet.” from pg 35 of the hard copy
· Agriculture is among the greatest contributors to global warming, emitting more greenhouse gases than all our cars, trucks, trains, and airplanes combined—largely from
o methane released by cattle and rice farms,
o nitrous oxide from fertilized fields, and
o carbon dioxide from the cutting of rain forests to grow crops or raise livestock.
o Farming is the thirstiest user of our precious water supplies
o Runoff from fertilizers and manure makes Farming a major polluter
o The spread of prosperity across the world, especially in China and India, is driving an increased demand for meat, eggs, and dairy, boosting pressure to grow more corn and soybeans to feed more cattle, pigs, and chickens.
o As we’ve cleared areas of grassland and forest for farms, we’ve lost crucial habitat, making agriculture a major driver of wildlife extinction.
·
· If these trends continue, the double whammy of population growth and richer diets will require us to roughly double the amount of crops we grow by 2050.
The author and his team proposed 5 steps to solve the world’s food dilemma.” I have taken his steps and included the validity of the argument to keep DBOC
1. Freeze Agriculture’s Footprint…. Avoiding further deforestation must be a top priority.
o OYSTER FARMING REQUIRES NO DEFORESTATION
2. Grow More on Farms We’ve Got…. high-tech, precision farming systems, and borrowing from organic farming, could boost yields in several times over.
o LEAVE DRAKES BAY OYSTER FARM RIGHT WHERE IT IS,
o It doesn’t require high tech farming systems,
o It is already 100% organic,
3. Use Resources More Efficiently….. Organic farming can also greatly reduce the use of water and chemicals
o Oyster Farming requires neither fertilizers nor chemicals, and uses no added fresh water!
4. Shift Diets…. Finding more efficient ways to grow meat and shifting to less meat-intensive diets…could free up substantial amounts of food Curtailing the use of food crops for biofuels could also enhance food availability.
o Retaining a sustainable, renewable, ecologically and environmentally beneficial source of food production – OYSTER FARMING – will do that. AND No one’s using oysters for bio-fuels!
5. Reduce Waste. 25 % of the world’s food calories … are lost or wasted before they can be consumed. Tackling waste would be one of THE most effective options for boosting food availability.
o Oysters come in individually, nature wrapped packages,
o buy what you need, eat what you bought!
o Even the shells are useful
§ whole they provide habitat restoration
§ crushed they can be used
§ organic fertilizer
§ ground cover
Oyster production is the winner in solving the world food shortage dilema.
George Washington is purported to have said “Our country is an experiment” and he gave it 20 years.
I give this Wilderness Without Oysters experiment 20 years. It will be put back for both reasons environmental and necessity. We’ll have 9 Billion mouths to feed.
It will be too late for the Lunnys, their workers and families as well as all the ranchers and dairies on this peninsula – for the water filtration system provided by the oysters having been removed will leave them as the major polluter of the estero, and soon, they too, will HAVE to go, unless CONGRESS INTERVENES.
CONGRESS: YOU HAVE ALREADY REQUESTED INSTALLATION OF MORE OYSTER FARMS ON ALL OUR COASTS
CONGRESS: Don’t let this Empty Environmental Experiment ruin the lives of all these people AND EXTINGUISH THE AGRICULTURAL CHARACTER OF WEST MARIN.
CONGRESS, you have the power and the authority to reverse this decision.
CONGRESS ACT TO REVERSE THIS DECISION TODAY.
Write your congress person today, let them know you want this farm to stay!
Share this:
Like this:
Posted by Jane Gyorgy on August 3, 2014
https://oysterzone.wordpress.com/2014/08/03/07-31-14-the-absurdity-of-the-removal-of-dboc-from-the-earth-or-the-dillema-of-feeding-7-billion-today-9-billion-by-2050/