10-25-13 Pacific Legal Foundation: 9th Circuit Should Re-Examine flawed ESA precedent

PLF Liberty Blog: President’s weekly report — October 25, 2013


President’s weekly report — October 25, 2013

Posted: 25 Oct 2013 02:28 PM PDT

Environment —  The Park Service’s war on oysters

This morning, PLF, joined by the California Cattlemen’s Association and the Building Industry Association of the Bay Area, filed an amicus brief in support of Drakes Bay Oyster Company’s petition for rehearing en banc of the Court’s September decision in the case. That opinion upheld the trial court’s denial of an injunction that would keep the shellfish farm in existence while it litigates its permit renewal claims against the Interior Department and the National Park Service.  For more details, see our blog post on this case.

 

Ninth circuit should re-examine flawed ESA precedent in re-hearing drakes bay appeal

Posted: 25 Oct 2013 12:37 PM PDT

Authored by Tony Francois

This morning PLF, joined by the California Cattlemen’s Association and the Building Industry Association of the Bay Area, filed an amicus brief in support of Drakes Bay Oyster Company’s petition for rehearing en banc of the Court’s September decision in their case. That opinion upheld the trial court’s denial of an injunction that would keep the shellfish farm in existence while it litigates its permit renewal claims against the Interior Department and the National Park Service.

A critical aspect of the Ninth Circuit’s decision is its ruling that the federal government could avoid examining the environmental impacts of an action, in this case destroying a long standing farming operation, if the agency intends to benefit the environment in taking that action.  This ruling is based on the Ninth Circuit’s dubious precedent in Douglas County v. Babbitt, which holds that the National Environmental Policy Act does not apply to designation of critical habitat under the Endangered Species Act.

PLF’s brief argues that Douglas County should be reversed.  Other federal circuits have expressly disagreed with the case, and common sense and experience have demonstrated that critical habitat designations do have significant environmental impacts that the government should identify and consider.  Just ask any Fresno County farmer who has been denied irrigation water whether designating critical habitat for the delta smelt has impacted the environment of the San Joaquin Valley.  And while you are asking, don’t forget to take today’s ESA at 40 Facebook poll.

The post Ninth circuit should re-examine flawed ESA precedent in re-hearing drakes bay appeal appeared first on PLF Liberty Blog.

Leave a comment

1 Comment

  1. Milly Biller

     /  October 28, 2013

    We are gaining momentum every minute!

    On Mon, Oct 28, 2013 at 12:29 PM, Drakes Bay Oyster Company & the National Park Service. Watch the video, THE FRAMING OF AN OYSTER FARM

    Reply

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: